Sunday 10 January 2021

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(13)








10. Kesimpulan (Bab 5) #JomTulisTesis. 

Kita akan mula membincangkan tentang penulisan dalam Bab 5. Dalam Bab 5 ini, kita sebenarnya mempunyai, kalau kita lihat dalam buku ini, kita mempunyai lebih kurang enam subtopik. Kalau kita lihat enam subtopik ini, kita mulakan 5.1 iaitu pengenalan seperti yang saya katakan sebelum ini dalam semua bab mesti mengandungi pengenalan dan juga kesimpulan. Namun, Bab 5 kesimpulan digantikan dengan penutup. Jadi pengenalan bab ini kita cuma huraikan apa yang terkandung dalam Bab 5 ini. Seterusnya, kita akan membincangkan tentang rumusan. Bahagian rumusan ini, sebenarnya kita tengok berapa jumlah objektif kita. Sekarang ni kita ada dua objektif. Jadi dalam rumusan maknanya kita akan membincangkan dalam dua perenggan sahaja. Tidak perlu banyak perenggan sebab rumusan ini kita sudah pun bincangkan dalam Bab 4. Jadi tidak perlu panjang lebar. Jadi kita mempunyai perenggan satu, perenggan dua. Jadi maknanya sekarang kita rumuskan objektif satu yang tentang mengenal pasti wacana tekstual animasi cerita rakyat Melayu, letak dalam satu perenggan. Kemudian menganalisis kesan skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah dalam perenggan kedua. Jadi ingat ya, dalam rumusan ini kita tidak perlu lagi nk menulis tentang apa yang data kita dapat, berapa orang sampel apa semua tu. Kita Cuma letak apakah keputusan kajian tapi dengan cara rumusan, makanya dengan cara ringkas sahaja. Namun, jika kita punya kajian kita berbentuk kualitatif, maknanya dalam rumusan ini kita letaklah data keputusan itu sahaja. Jadi bukanlah data yang awal yang kita peroleh tetapi data keputusan akhir sahaja. Yang itu kita boleh letak dalam bentuk penomboran. Jadi dalam rumusan ini ingat ya, ringkas dan juga dalam rumusan tidak boleh sama dengan rumusan dalam Bab 4, tidak boleh sama, kena berhati-hati di situ ya. Seterusnya kita masuk kepada implikasi, implikasi ini ialah tentang apakah implikasi kajian ini tentang keputusan kajian yang awak dapat diperoleh ni, apakah implikasi dia. Memberi manafaat kepada siapa. Jadi awak kena senaraikan dalam bentuk perenggan juga. Jadi ini pastikan bahawa implikasi ini agak berbeza dengan apa yang awak tulis dalam kepentingan kajian. Jadi yang inilah kita lebih terperinci lagi lah. Contohnya kalau kita nampak kepentingan kajian itu dalam kalangan masyarakat keseluruhannya, jadi dalam implikasi itu siapa dalam golongan siapa, pelajar sekolah rendah sahaja ke, pelajar istimewa ke, pelajar sekolah. Jadi kita akan rincikan dengan lebih teliti ya. Kemudian kita akan masuk 5.4 ya. 5.4 ini kebaharuan. Okay ini perkara yang baharu ya, perkara yang baharu yang mana biasanya tesis jarang kita dapat lihat tentang subtopik ini tetapi kita perlu wujudkan subtopik kebaharuan. Apa kebaharuan ni?. Dalam bahasa Inggerisnya ialah novelty. Jadi novelty ini penting ya, dimana kita akan menunjukkan apa perkara baharu yang kita peroleh yang kita dapat setelah kita jalankan kajian, kita dapatkan keputusan kajian, apa kebaharuannya. Kalau kita lihat dalam kita punya kajian ini, di sini contohnya, jadi contohnya ya, dalam animasi cerita rakyat Melayu ini, okay yang diterbit oleh Dewan Bahasa Pustaka, contohnya ya ia terbit tahun 2020. Baru sahaja diterbitkan. Jadi baru sahaja diterbitkan maknanya tak de siapa lagi lah yang boleh buat kajian lagi. Jadi awak lah orang yang pertama yang membuat kajian ini. Dan juga, contohnya sekarang, skrip animasi ini memanglah perkara baharu serupa, benda yang sama ya skrip animasi ini diberi pendapat oleh pelajar sekolah, okay tentang pandangan dia, tentang skrip animasi. Perkara baharu juga. Jadi perlu dihuraikan dalam satu perenggan sahaja tentang apakah kebaharuan yang terdapat dalam kajian awak ini. Jadi huraikan dalam satu perenggan tentang yang tadi lah skrip animasi itu dan juga tentang kesan dia bagaimana pelajar sekolah rendah dapat memberi pendapat tentang skrip itu tersebut ya. Okay seterusnya 5.5 ialah cadangan. Cadangan ini biasanya kekadang pelajar dia buat silap ya, dia buat salah sikit, jadi yang ini awak boleh buat dalam bentuk subtopik. Jangan letak macam contoh ada pelajar dia pergi letak perkataan, subtajuk dia metodologi, kemudian dia huraikan, dia anggapkan bahawa dia cadangkan dari segi metodologi ubah. Ini tidak jelas ya. Jadi apa perlu awak buat, jangan letak yang macam ni awak kena cadangkan tajuk dia. Jadi kalau contohnya, kajian ini ‘wacana tekstual skrip animasi cerita rakyat’, okay jadi awak boleh cadangkan ya dalam skrip animasi cerita rakyat ini juga mengandungi lirik lagu ataupun lagu cerita rakyat. Jadi awak boleh cadangakan kajian tentang lirik lagu animasi cerita rakyat. Jadi bawah ni awak perlu buat huraian, huraian tentang apa yang dimaksudkan yang ini. Okay barulah yang ini cadangan awak lebih fokus daripada awak letak satu perkataan sahaja. Itu tidak berfokus. Jadi itu baru satu. Kemudian 5.1.2 awak cadangkan yang lain lagi mungkin daripada skrip animasi cerita rakyat tu awak boleh cadangkan kajian kepada kanak-kanak yang berumur tujuh tahun untuk mengenal pasti kata kerja ataupun kata adjektif dalam skrip animasi cerita rakyat. Itu bendanya kita letak seluruh ayat tu kena beri huraian apa benda dia, macam mana kajian itu dijalankan. Okay yang untuk cadangan ini, kita letak minima tiga dan maksima kita letak lima kerana ada pelajhar kadang-kadang dia letak satu sahaja. Jadi satu sahaja menunjukkan bahawa kajian awak yang sebelum ni tak lah berapa penting dan sampai tak de kajian lagi yang boleh, kajian lanjutan yang kita boleh cadangkan. Jadi lebih baik kita letakkan minima tiga, seperti yang saya kata, saya ulang tadi ya, letakkan tajuk, tajuk ya jangan perkataan, letakkan tajuk kemudian beri huraian, letakkan ayat tajuk kajian, huraian. Kemudia letak tiga. Seterusnya, yang akhir ialah penutup. Yang penutup ini satu perenggan sahaja. Okay dalam satu perenggan sahaja iaitu awak kena tutup bukan sahaja Bab 5 tapi keseluruhan tesis. Jadi yang ini ya perlu diingat bahawa ini ayat awak sendiri. Tidak ada data lagi dah dalam tu, tak de rujukan dah, tak perlu ada. Ini ayat awak sendiri, awak nak tutup awak punya kajian. Dah penat buat bertahun-tahun tesis ini awak perlu tutup. Ini ayat sendiri lah. Ayat yang tentang kajian awak. Jadi keseluruhan Bab 5 ini biasanya lapan hingga 10 halaman. Tidak perlu panjang kerana kalau dilihat pengenalan ringkas sahaja, dan juga penutup baru seperenggan seperenggan, baru satu halaman, yang lain sahaja huraian. Ini lebih kurang. Lebih kurang dia punya halaman ya. Jadi jangan lebih-lebih. Sebab ada didapati pelajar dia letak sampai 20 halaman, tak tau apa yang dia letak. Kadang-kadang jadi yang banyak sangat halaman tu sebab rumusan ini. Dia pergi copy paste daripada Bab 4 ataupun huraian yang dia ada ni entah mana yang dia dapat pula, dia letak pulak rujukan tiba-tiba. Ingat, dalam rumusan ni dah tak perlu ada rujukan lagi dah. Tak perlu dah sebab kita nak merumuskan. Kalau rujukan-rujukan ni kita dh ada letak dalam Bab 4. Jadi tak perlu ada rujukan lagi dah dalam ini. Implikasi ni pun tak perlu ada rujukan dah. Malah kebaharuan ini pun dah tak perlu ada rujukan, cadangan pun tiada. Sebab Bab 5 ni kebanyakannya kita nak simpulkan keseluruhan kajian yang kita telah jalankan. Okay. 


TERJEMAHAN BAHASA INGGERIS

10. Conclusion (Chapter 5) #Let'sWriteAThesis.


We will begin to discuss the writing in Chapter 5. In this Chapter 5, we actually have, if we look in this book, we have about six subtopics. If we look at these six subtopics, we start with 5.1 which is the introduction as I said before in all the chapters should contains an introduction and also a conclusion. However, Chapter 5 conclusion is replaced by a closing. So, in the introduction to this chapter we just describe what is contained in this Chapter 5. Next, we will discuss the summary. Part of this summary, we actually see how many of our objectives are. Now we have two objectives. So, in summary it means we will discuss in two paragraphs only. There is no need for many paragraphs because this conclusion we have already discussed in Chapter 4. So, there is no need for length. So, we have paragraph one, paragraph two. So, does this mean we now conclude that the objective of identifying textual discourse animation Malay folklore, put in one paragraph. Then analyze the effect of animation script Malay folklore among primary school students in the second paragraph. So remember, in this summary we no longer need to write about what data we get, how many people sample what it all is. We just put what the results of the study but in a concise way, so in a concise way only. However, if we have our study in the form of qualitative, it means in this summary we put the data of the results only. So, it is not the initial data that we obtain but the final decision data only. That we can put in the form of numbering. So, in this summary remember, concise and also in the summary can not be the same as the summary in Chapter 4, can not be the same, be careful there okay. Next, we go into the implications, these implications are about what are the implications of this study about the results of the study that you can obtain, what are the implications of it. Benefit to whom. So, you have to list it in paragraph form as well. So, make sure that these implications are quite different from what you wrote in the important of the study. So, this is what we are more detailed about. For example, if we see the importance of the study in society as a whole, so in that implication who is in the group of who, only primary school students, special students, or school students. So, we will detail in more detail okay. Then we will enter 5.4 okay. 5.4 is a novelty. Okay this is a new thing, a new thing which is usually the thesis we rarely see about this subtopic but we need to create a novelty subtopic. What is this novelty?. In Malay it is kebaharuan. So, this kebaharuan is important okay, where we will show what new things we get that we get after we conduct a study, we get the results of the study, what is the novelty. If we had seen in our study, here for example, be an example, in this animation Malay folklore, okay published by Dewan Bahasa Pustaka, for instance okay it was published in 2020. Recently published. So, it has just been published, meaning no one else can do the research anymore. So, you are the first person to do this study. And also, for example now, this animated script is indeed a similar new thing, the same thing this animated script is given an opinion by the school student, okay about his views, about the animated script. New things too. So, it is necessary to describe in one paragraph only about what novelties are found in this study of yours. So, describe in one paragraph about the previous animated script and also about the effect he had on how primary school students can give an opinion about the script. Okay next 5.5 is a suggestion. This suggestion is usually a student he made a mistake, he did a little wrong, so this one you can do in subtopic form. Do not put an example of a student he went to put a word, subtitled him methodology, then he elaborated, he assumed that he suggested in terms of methodology change. This is not clear. So, what do you need to do, do not put something like this you have to suggest the title of him. So, if for example, this study is ‘textual discourse of folklore animated script script’, okay so you can suggest in this folklore animation script also contains song lyrics or folklore songs. So, you can suggest a study on the lyrics of animated folklore songs. So, below you need to make a description, a description of what this means. Okay then this is your suggestion more focused than you put just one word. That is not focused. So, that's just one. Then 5.1.2 you suggest something else that might be from the folklore animation script then you can suggest a study to a seven-year-old child to identify the verbs or adjectives in the folklore animation script. That's the thing we put the whole sentence has to give a description of what he is, how the study was conducted. Okay for this suggestion, we put a minimum of three and a maximum of five we put because there are students who sometimes put only one. So, only one shows that your previous study is not as important and until there is no further study that can be, further study that we can suggest. So, we better put a minimum of three, as I said, I repeated okay, put a title, a title yes do not words, put a title then give a description, put a sentence of the title of the study, a description. Then place three. Next, the last one is the cover. The cover is one paragraph only. Okay in one paragraph only that you have to cover not only Chapter 5 but the whole thesis. So, this one keep in mind that this is your own sentence. There is no more data in it, no reference, no need. This is your own sentence, you want to close you have a study. Tired for many years doing this thesis, this thesis you need to close. This is the verse itself. A sentence about your study. So, the whole of this Chapter 5 is usually eight to 10 pages. It does not need to be long because if you look at the brief introduction only, and also the closing of a paragraph, there were just one page, only another is description. This is more or less. More or less about the pages. So, do not overdo it. Because there are students he puts up to 20 pages, do not know what he puts. Sometimes there are so many pages because of this summary. He went to copy and paste from Chapter 4 or the description he had, no matter where he got it, he suddenly put a reference. Remember, in this summary there is no need for a reference anymore. No need because we want to summarize it. If we have these references, we have them in Chapter 4. So, there is no need for any references in this. This implication does not even need a reference. Even this novelty does not need a reference, no suggestions. Because most of Chapter 5 we want to summarize the whole study that we have conducted. Okay.


Rujukan:

Prof. Dr Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2020). 10. Kesimpulan (Bab 5) #JomTulisTesis. Diakses pada Januari 8,  2021 melalui pautan https://youtu.be/KRrs_--kW8w



Saya sudah subscribe! 



Kehadiran minggu 11!



BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(12)








8. Metodologi (Bab 3) #JomTulisTesis.

Okey, kita dah masuk ke bab 3 ya. Bab 3 ini bab metodologi. Metodologi ini memang kita bila salah huraian, kalau salah huraian memang salah semuanya ya. Jadi kalau kita lihat dalam bab 3. Okey, kita ada banyak subtopik. Tujuannya supaya kita sendiri faham dan pemeriksa pun faham, orang lain yang di mana-mana sahaja berada dalam Malaysia, luar negara, bila baca pun faham kerana kita huraikan secara kita menjalankan kajian. Itulah namanya metodologi. Jadi di sini kita lihat, kita ada banyak subtopik ya. Banyak subtopik di sini, iaitu pengenalan, reka bentuk kajian, kaedah kajian. Kaedah kajian terbahagi kepada sampel jika perlulah. Maknanya kalau ada, adalah kita menggunakan sampel. Dan juga kita ada lokasi, kalau kita menggunakan responden untuk kat sekolah ke, dekat mana-manalah, orang kampung ke. Kemudian, kita ada bahan ataupun instrumen kajian. Kita ada prosedur, analisis, kerangka teori, kerangka konseptual dan juga kesimpulan. 

Okey, seperti biasa pengenalan kita, pengenalan kita tadi dalam satu perenggan. Itu tak ada masalahlah, iaitu 3.1 Pengenalan. Kemudian kita ada reka bentuk, okey reka bentuk. Dalam reka bentuk huraian itu dalam pendek je sebenarnya dalam satu perenggan je. Sebab kita jangan keliru ya, kita cuma. Dalam reka bentuk ni cuma kita nak jelaskan bahawa adakah kita menggunakan kaedah kualitatif atau kuantitatif, okey. Jadi itu kalau kita guna kedua-duanya, kita jelaskanlah. Okey, jadi kalau misalnya awak nak buat rujukan sikit dekat sini ke, menurut siapa-siapa, tapi adalah wajar untuk tidak beri definisi. Nak buat apa kita nak bagi definisi. Definisi kuantitatiflah, kemudian definisi kualitatiflah, nak buat apa. Tak perlu. Cuma kita memberikan bahawa, sebab ingat ye bab 3 ni huraian tentang kajian kita yang kajian nak jalankan ni. 

Jadi dalam satu perenggan cerita pasal kualitatif atau kuantitatif atau kedua-duanya. Kemudian kita masuk ke 3.3 baru kaedah kajian. Kaedah kajian ini barulah yang kita nak jalankan kajian ini. Apa kaedah yang kita gunakan. Jadi kalau disini kalau kita gunakan sampel, kita letaklah. Kita akan letaklah siapa. Jadi, okey kita bagi contoh ya kalau sampel kajian saya menggunakan 20 orang pelajar. Jadi sekarang ini saya kena pastikan bahawa saya kena huraikan dengan terperinci iaitu saya pakai ni. Saya pakai sekolah rendah, lelaki berapa, perempuan berapa. Umur 9 tahun. Kena spesifik ya. Kena spesifik. Yang lelaki dan perempuan kena tulis berapa lelaki, berapa perempuan. Kita dah cakap sekolah rendah kan. Kemudian kita ada satu lagi, subtopik iaitu lokasi. Lokasi ini kita kena letaklah. Contoh, Sekolah Kebangsaan Serdang. Masalahnya sekarang saya tahu sekolah tu kat mana, pemeriksa tak tahu. Okey, pemeriksa tu mungkin tinggal di negeri lain dia tak tahu kat mana. 

Mungkin kita akan letak koordinat okey, dan lebih bagus letak peta. Peta daripada Google Maps ke daripada yang jelas menunjukkan lokasi sekolah ini daripada jalan besar. Supaya orang “Oh, sekolah ni disini”. Dan juga awak kena tahulah sekolah ini luar bandar ataupun bandar. Jadi kena jelas terperinci itu yang saya kata dalam Metodologi kena terperinci. Jadi ada lokasi. Kemudian, kita ada bahan. Okey, tadi kita punya kajian ini tentang Wacana Tekstual Skrip Animasi ya. Jadi sekarang ini saya ada sampel, saya ada lokasi kajian ini. Sampel itu kita ambil pelajar sekolah untuk kita temubual untuk skrip animasi. Saya juga ada bahan ataupun instrumen yang saya gunakan. Jadi sekarang cerita tentang bahan ini, cerita tentang animasi cerita rakyat terbitan Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP) yang ditulis oleh Normaliza Abd Rahim pada tahun ini. 

Animasi cerita rakyat ini saya yang tulis ya dan lagu, lirik lagu, skrip semua saya yang buat dan diterbitkan oleh Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Dan kalau nak tengok boleh tengok di Google Store, ada 33 buah cerita dan 33 buah lagu. Ini promosi tiba-tiba. Okey, ni sekarang ini bolehlah siapa-siapa yang nak tunjuk kepada anak saudara, atau jiran punya anak saudara, atau jiran punya jiran punya anak saudara ataupun anak dia, cucu dia pun boleh. Murah je sebenarnya kita jual dan semua itu animasi saya buat. Memang saya buat dan DBP yang terbitkan. Maknanya memang bahasanya bagus, dan cerita rakyat ialah cerita rakyat Melayu kita turun temurun. Silalah tengok di Google Store, dekat Apple tiada. 

Jadi sekarang bahan ini tadi kita masukkan ini. Kemudian, disini juga kita akan letak sinopsis. Sinopsis cerita rakyat. Contohnya tajuk cerita rakyat nombor satu iaitu Cenderawasih. Contoh ya, saya letak sinopsis di sini. Saya perlu letak sinopsis, sebab sekarang kita perlu ingat, kita tahu cerita ini, tetapi pemeriksa tak tahu. Orang yang nak baca tesis kita tak tahu. Jadi kita letaklah sinopsis. Kalau misalnya cerita ini saya ambil 20 cerita rakyat. Letak 20 sinopsis cerita dalam ni. Mesti letak dan perlu letak. Kemudian kita pergi ke prosedur. Jadi prosedur kita ini, kita kena letak kekadang ada terpulang kepada pelajar dan juga penyelia ya. Ada prosedur yang dia letak dalam bentuk point 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 sampai 10. Ada yang letak dalam bentuk perenggan bermakna kalau ada lima prosedur dia letak lima perenggan boleh, tak ada masalah. Asalkan kita tahu bahawa prosedur pertama ada kaitan dengan prosedur kedua ada kaitan dengan ketiga, keempat adalah berkaitan. 

Janganlah nombor satu awak kata awak ambil apa nama ni awak panggil pelajar ataupun, eh tadi nak ikut objektif satu dia kenal pasti skrip wacana tekstual. Awak ambil skrip animasi tersebut kemudian awak analisis. Analisis dengan menggunakan ni ni ni ni tiba-tiba, prosedur kedua awak dah panggil pelajar untuk beri pendapat? Bilanya panggil budak tu membaca skrip tu? Bila pula tu. Macam seolah langkah itu prosedur dah melompat-lompat jadi salah. Jadi pastikan ini, terpulang bentuk point atau bentuk perenggan tetapi perenggan. Tetapi pastikan ia mengikut macam mana awak jalankan kajian, itu penting. Langkah-langkah bagaimana jalankan kajian tu. Awak je yang tahu orang lain semua tak tahu. Jadi kena langkah satu satu. 

Okey balik kepada 3.5 merupakan analisis. Analisis ini penting ya sebab sekarang ini kita ada dua objektif. Jadi awak huraikan mengikut objektif pun boleh. Jadi awak huraikan analisis pertama. Pertama apa digunakan dengan cara begini. Jadi disinilah awak akan letak yang awak buat coding tadi. Ingat tak coding yang saya cerita kat dalam dekat dalam bab 4 tadi? Macam contoh, nanti kejap ya. Okey contohnya, awak dah buat coding SK1 hingga SK30 merupakan skrip lah. Skrip 1 hingga 30. S1 hingga S30 ialah sampel 1 hingga sampel 30. Jadi itu, analisis ini awak kena jelaskan dan huraian tadi jelas itu. SK ini biasanya kadang-kadang dia orang akan buat dalam bentuk jadual iaitu dalam maksudnya sini SK maknanya ni skrip. 

Okey, bermakna SK1 maknanya skrip 1. Sampel tadi awak nak pakai sampel 1 bermakna sampel 1. Ini dia punya kotak, nanti huraian awak ceritalah SK merujuk kepada apa-apa dia hurai, hurai, hurai, hurai. Sebab ini coding ni penting. Sebab dalam data kalau tak ada coding-coding kita nak letak ni kita tak faham. Takkanlah kita nak cari tiap kali nak taip skrip 1, skrip 2, skrip 3. Tak bolehlah macam tu kan. Dan juga yang ni pula sebelum awak dah ada yang ini, kena ada pula satu lagi jadual yang menunjukkan SK1 maknanya cerita apa Cenderawasih. Okey SK2 cerita apa? Okey burung pipit contoh dia. Ini tajuk, tajuk daripada skrip. Skrip yang awak dapati daripada cerita animasi itu tadi. Kena letak inilah, ni letak lepastu hurai. 

Kemudian bawah tu barulah awak ceritakan macam mana awak analisis data tersebut. Berikan contoh macam mana awak nak analisis. Jadi yang ini kadang-kadang pelajar pandai dia tengok Bab 4. Okey, macam mana dia bawa bab 4 tu sikit letak dekat sini. Contoh analisis supaya pemeriksa faham, “Oh, begini cara dia analisis rupanya untuk objektif 1”. “Oh, begini cara dianalisis untuk objekif 2”. Asingkan cara awak nak huraian tentang analisis objektif 1 dengan objektif 2 dan objektif 3. Dan disitulah baru pemeriksa akan faham cara analisis data ini ya. Seterusnya, setelah buat macam mana analisis, kita ada 3.4 Kerangka Teori. Jadi kerangka teori ini 3.4 ya. 

Okey kerangka teori ni ialah pemilihan teori awak teori apa. Jadi sekarang tadi kita memilih Teori Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim 2019. Jadi lukislah kerangka teori, tulis sini Teori Analisis Wacana. Kemudian awak letak tadi seperti yang dapat tadilah. Jadi ini rangka dia. Kemudian bawah ini rajah 1 Teori Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim 2019. Kemudian, bila dah ada ini 3.4, barulah bawah ini huraikan tentang teori. Dalam rajah 1 di atas, da…da…daaa… Dan dalam inilah awak huraikan satu persatu ni huraian-huraian ni tentang teori Normaliza Abd Rahim ini. Yang ini sahaja lebih kurang 2 hingga 3 halaman sebab ini penting kerana huraian tentang teori ini penting Kerana macam saya katakan sebelum ini bahawa, kita menganalisis data kita jalankan kajian mesti berpaksikan teori. Tak ada teori memang payah nak jalan. Jadi takkan kita nak pakai analisis je. 

Ada juga saya dapati bila saya jadi pemeriksa Viva ya, ada juga pelajar yang bila dia bentang-bentang memang terkejutlah. Mata saya terbuntang sekejap, ternganga sekejap, sebab dia kata “Oh, tiada teori yang digunakan”. Oh letih masa tu memang terkejut, memang tak tahu apa nak buat. Macam mana boleh analisis data tiada teori. Dia kata “Oh, saya rasa”, ini semua main “saya rasa” je ni memang tak kemanalah rasalah sendiri. Jadi sekarang dia rajah 1 huraikan semuanya. Tiap-tiap satu ini tapi ingat ya, huraian tentang teori janganlah salin bulat-bulat. Macam contohnya teori saya ada dalam buku saya ini. Kajian Wacana Strategi Komunikasi Teori dan Aplikasi. 

Ada dalam buku teori tu, ada jugaklah budak pergi salin bulat-bulat. Dia ingatkan kita ni tak tengok ke. Saya rajin membaca ya. Jadi jangan, ubah ayat. Itu orang kata kena parafrasa ayat-ayat itu. Jadi, tapi kena sebutlah menurut Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) kandungan bla..bla..bla. Jadi ceritakan, ceritakan tentang teori dan juga dalam teori ini boleh juga cerita tentang teori analisis wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim merujuk kepada teori yang dicadangkan oleh siapa-siapa sebelum ini. Memperbaiki teori yang terdahulu sebab teori yang lama semua yang didapati 1980, 1977. Ada yang terlalu lama sedangkan kita perlu tahu bahawa pada zaman dahulu, kita manusia pun berbeza. Kita dah digital sekarang. 

Manusia dia lebih banyak bercakap dan berani bercakap secara maya. Dan juga sebenarnya itu memang boleh buat kajian banyak ya. Bila bercakap sekarang kanak-kanak kecil kita tanya satu dia jawab 46. Jadi dulu memang zaman dulu memang orang tua-tua cakap itu tanya dia satu soalan dijawab 10 tapi sekarang zaman 2020, kita tanya satu soalan dia jawab 47 jawapan. Memang kita nak dengar sampai kata-kata stop, dia tak berhenti-berhenti bagi jawapan. Siap kita pergi supermarket beli barang, tak habis lagi bagi jawapan. Itu kanak-kanak sekarang. Sebab itu kita tidak bolehlah, boleh pakai tetapi kadang-kadang tidak relevan dengan keadaan sekarang ini. 

Tambahan pula, jika kita nak buat kajian tentang interaksi, tentang ujaran, tentang penulisan berbeza. Dulu punya tahun 6 dia punya tatabahasa dan berbeza dengan sekarang yang tahun 6 yang nak dekat sama macam tingkatan 5 zaman dulu. Jadi sangat berbeza, sebab itulah kita kalau jumpa teori yang baharu kita pakai yang baru. Sebab orang yang membuat kajian ini yang melahirkan teori ini, dia telah melakukan beratus-ratus kajian sebelum dia dapat satu teori ini. Seperti juga Teori Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim, dia ni dah buat kajian nak dekat beratus baru dapat teori ini. Itu pun jenuh bertukar-tukar cuba ni lagi cuba eksperimen ini lagi, eksperimen itu tak jadi tak jadi. Akhirnya dia dapat satu yang boleh sesuai dengan keadaan zaman digital kita sekarang ini. 

Okey setelah buat kerangka teori ini, kita ada 3.5 kerangka konseptual. Jadi kerangka konseptual ini mengikut penyelia masing-masinglah. Sebab ada penyelia yang mengatakan kerangka konseptual itu seperti tatacara. Ada yang mengatakan ini bukan kerangka konseptual. Okey, ini saya dah jelaskan dalam buku ini. sebenarnya semua ini tertakluk kepada penyelia fakulti dan Universiti. Dia cuma panduan je buku ni. Saya tak suruh pun beli buku ni. Tapi kalau nak carilah ada dekat shopee pun ada jual. Saya pun terkejut UPM, dia kata dekat Shopee pun boleh beli. Okey ni sekarang ini kalau kita lihat contoh yang saya nak tunjukkan tentang kerangka ini, yang sebelah kiri ini ya. Ini menunjukkan kerangka konseptual. Ini cara saya. Macam yang saya katakan tadi.

Mungkin penyelia lain berbeza, dia akan kata, “Eh ni bukan kerangka konseptual ini macam tatacara” ini, ada yang kata itu. Ada yang kata “Oh inilah cara lain”. Tak apa, jangan bimbang jangan gusar pelajar ya. Pelajar ikut je cakap penyelia masing-masing. Ingat ya ini panduan je. Saya nak ajar ni pun cara saya nak bagi supaya awak dapat bayangkan “Oh ini cara dia”. Tapi bila awak buat mungkin lain, tidak mengapa tak ada masalah ya. Bila kerangka konseptual tu ada, ni letak dalam satu halaman ni ya. Bila kerangka konseptual, bila kita lihat sekali sedangkan awak dah hurai semua ni dalam bab 3. Tapi bila sekali saya tengok baru saya faham alur dia tu, “Oh gunakan ini instrumen”, “Oh bahan dia ini”. Jadi kita dapat lihatlah dengan lebih jelas dekat sini. 

Kalau saya nak terperinci, saya patah balik tengok dia punya huraian bagi tiap-tiap satu subtopik itu. Bagi saya itulah kerangka konseptual. Jadi bagi pelajar terpulanglah macam mana tapi ini bagi saya ini jelas. Okey kalau tengok bahan okey nak tengok lebih terperinci tengok dekat bab 3. Jadi ini letakkan di akhir. Jadi yang ini 3.5 ini tidak perlu huraian. Langsung tak perlu huraian kerana huraian sudah pun dibuat. Letak je kat atas ni satu halaman memang habis. Kemudian, 3.6 terus masuk kesimpulan. Jadi dalam kesimpulan ini macam biasa awak simpulkan daam satu perenggan. Ingat ya, macam saya katakan tadi semua bab ada kesimpulan kecuali bab 5. Semua bab ada pengenalan, semua bab ada takda yang terkecuali. Jadi kena ada. 

Setiap bab pengenalan tu memang huraikan apa dalam bab. Okey untuk bab 3, biasa dia tanya “Prof berapa halaman ya bab 3?”. Jadi bab 3 ni kita sebenarnya tak, sebab kita cuma benda-benda semua huraian yang kita punya ya. Jadi tak perlu banyak. Bukanlah sampai 40 halaman. Okey dalam ni pun dia ada nyatakan biasanya yang ini saya, saya kata tak perlu banyak 10 hingga 12 macam tu. Jangan sampai 20 halaman. Kalau 20 halaman bendalah awak nak buat. Mungkin yang banyak tu disini, sinopsis cerita, mungkin itu yang banyak. Tetapi yang lain-lain itu semua, sebab kita jelas ya. Macam kita cerita pasal sampel okey ini dia, okey bahan ini dia la. Kalau contoh kita buat kajian tentang Instagram contoh dia kan. Jadi kita letak bahan, kita boleh screencapture satu contoh letak dekat situ. Okey contoh yang Instagram itulah. Kita boleh letak kat situ tapi ini tak perlulah. sebab kita ada sinopsis sikit bagi 20 cerita itu. kita itu jadi lebih panjang. 

Dapatlah lebih kurang 10 hingga 12 halaman. Sebab ini bukan bab analisis, ini bab metodologi. Cara kita menjalankan kajian. Okey selain daripada itu, saya rasa untuk bab 3 kalau lihat semua saya dah jelaskan dengan terperinci dan juga huraian bagi setiap satu tu kena panjang ya, sampel, lokasi, bahan, kena panjang. Kadang-kadang ada juga pelajar yang letak kata rintis. Contoh-contohnya dalam prosedur ke lepas prosedur ke tentang rintis, kajian rintis. Boleh juga sebab kita nak maklumkan bahawa kajian rintis dijalankan. Kadang-kadang dia letak bab 3. Okey boleh juga nak diletakkan di situ supaya kadang-kadang yelah kajian rintis ni melibatkan soal selidik. Soal selidik kadang-kadang rintis-rintiskan sebanyak dua atau tiga kali round pun tak betul juga lagi. Cuba lagi banyak kali sehinggalah soal selidik itu betul-betul sempurna. 


Jadi itu boleh jelaskan dalam ini. Tapi jika tidak melibatkan soalan tak mengapa. Kalau contoh ni tadi, dalam bahan ini tadi. Ini bahan sebab kajian ini melibatkan skrip kan. Jadi kalau melibatkan soalan temu bual. Maknanya, dalam sini kena ada satu lagi iaitu instrumen. Okey sebab ini tadi sebab tak pakai ya kajian. Jadi yang kalau melibatkan soal selidik kena adalah instrumen. Jadi disinilah awak kena huraikan instrumen apa, soal selidik. Jadi dalam soal selidik ini biasanya awak letak sajalah. Kalau kadang-kadang orang letak kat lampiran. Boleh juga tetapi jelaskan apa yang ada. Okey bahagian A mengandungi 5 soalan. apa dia, bahagian B apa dia, bahagian C apa dia. Okey ini 3.3.4.1. 

Lepas tu, awak ada pula soalan temu bual. Macam mana temu bual dijalankan, huraikan disini. Dan juga soalan temu bual tu letaklah soalan 1 apa dia, soalan 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Disinilah kalau awak nak letakkan tentang kajian rintis. Jadi adalah semuanya disini. Jadi itu kalau awak pakai instrumen, kalau tiada tak perlu letaklah. Jadi sekarang kena ada. Jadi kalau misalnya, soal selidik itu tidak mahu letak disini. Biasa orang letak dalam lampiran. Soalan temu bual boleh letak sebab tak banyak soalan. Jadi biasanya kajian yang kita jalankan kita perlu adalah trianglelation ya. Maknanya sekarang dalam bahagian ini, kita ada temu bual, kita ada soal selidik, dan juga mungkin lagi satu dia ada buat pemerhatian. 

Ia lah kalau dia nak jumpa pelajar itu, dia kena ada pemerhatian. Pastikan bahawa bila ada pemerhatian itu kita kena jelaskanlah dengan pelajar macam mana cara dia. Adakah awak pasang video letak kat tepi, awak perhatikan dia temu bual antara awak dengan pelajar itu atau dua orang pelajar kat depan. Awak kena letaklah video itu, kena ceritakan. Ceritakan itu cara-cara di sini. Cara-cara pemerhatian itu dijalankan. Selepas itu, semasa prosedur itu, awak jelaskan step by step daripada mula sampai habis. Kalau nak asingkan ikut objektif pun tak apa. Sebab objektif 1 awak tadi berbeza dengan objektif 2. Okey boleh faham tak ni. Jadi saya harap yang ini saya ulang balik, kita ada pengenalan, reka bentuk. Tengok sinilah senang, kita ada pengenalan, reka bentuk, kaedah, sampel, lokasi, bahan atau instrumen ini memang ada nyata di sini. Saya tertinggal tadi maaf ya.

Jadi kita ada bahan kita jelaskan bahan. Kalau kita ada bahanlah. Lepas itu kita asingkan dengan instrumen yang kita gunakan. Jadi kalau ada kedua-duanya letak dua-dua sekali. Tapi pastikan pernomboran itu berbeza. Kemudian, kita ada prosedur, analisis. Kemudian, kita ada kerangka teori dan kerangka konseptual. Dan akhirnya kesimpulan. Jadi, dalam bab ini lebih kurang 10 hingga 12 muka surat. Paling banyak pun 15. Jadi biasanya jarang pelajar buat sampai 15 halaman. Sebab tiada apa yang kita boleh jelaskan panjang lebar ya. Jadi ingat bab 3 ini sangat penting. Biasa bab 3 ini untuk kajian kita. Makna huraian tentang bagaimana cara untuk kita nak menjalankan kajian. Jadi yang dalam ini, ingat tidak perlulah bila awak tulis sampel, kemudian awal tulis definisi sampel. Nak buat apa? Kita tak mahu hendak baca tentang itu. 

Ada juga pelajar tulis definisi, menurut kamus dewan bla bla bla. Memanglah nak kena garis dengan pen merah lah tu. Tidak perlu definisi-definisi semua ini. Sebab yang ini semua kita punya, pelajar punya. Kecuali di sini awak hendak cerita sedikit definisi, bukanlah definisi tetapi adalah rujukan, bolehlah. Kalau tiada rujukan tiada masalah. Sebab ingat bab 3 ini kita punya, kecuali teori. Teori bukanlah kita punya. Itu sahaja. Teori itu bukan kita punya, yang lain itu memang kita punya. Sebab kita hendak bagi pemeriksa faham tentang macam mana kajian kita dijalankan. Kita hendak bagitahu kalau misalnya pelajar lain, bila baca merujuk tesis kita, mereka akan faham terus tentang bagaimana kajian kita ini dijalankan ya.


TERJEMAHAN BAHASA INGGERIS

8. Metodology (Chapter 3) #Let'sWriteAThesis. 

Okay, we've now on to chapter 3. Chapter 3 is a methodology chapter. This methodology is ours if the description is wrong, if the description is wrong, everything is wrong. So if we look at chapter 3. Okay, we have a lot of subtopics. The purpose is for us to understand and the examiners also understand, other people who are everywhere either in Malaysia, or abroad, when they read also can understand because we describe in the way we conduct the research. That is named by the methodology. So here we see we have a lot of subtopics. Many subtopics here, such as introduction, study design, research methods. The study method is divided into samples, if necessary. The meaning if any, is that we use a sample. And also we have a location, if we use the respondents, maybe respondents in the school, near anywhere, or maybe we use the villagers. Then, we have research materials or instruments. We have procedures, analysis, theoretical frameworks, conceptual frameworks and even conclusions.

Okay, as usual our introduction, our introduction earlier in one paragraph. That was supposely no problem, it is 3.1 Introduction. Then we have a design, okay design. In the design of the description in just short for sure, actually need to be only in one paragraph. Because we should not be confused. In this design we just want to explain that whether we use qualitative or quantitative methods, okay. So if we use both, we just explaining for both. Okay, so if for example you want to make a little reference near here, according to anyone, but it is reasonable not to give a definition. What do we need to do on that definition. Quantitative definition, then qualitative definition, what to do? No need. We just give that because remember, chapter 3 is a description of our study that the study wants to do this.

So in one paragraph the story is qualitative or quantitative or both. Then we go into the new 3.3 study method. This is the only method we want to conduct through this study. What method does we use. So here if we use a sample, just put it. We will place who. So, it's okay for us to give an example, if my study sample uses 20 students. So now I have to make sure that I have to describe in detail that I use those sampel. I use sampel of primary school, how many boys, how many girls. Maybe they are 9 years old. Be specific. Be specific. Either man and women, have to write how many men, how many women. We already talked about primary school. Then we have another, subtopic that is location. We have to put this location. For example, Sekolah Kebangsaan Serdang. The problem now is maybe I know where the school is, but the examiner does not know. Okay, maybe the examiner lives in another country, so that he does not know where are the place.

Maybe we will place the coordinates okay, and better place the map. Maps from Google Maps to out clearly show the location of this school from the highway. So that people "Oh, this school is here". And also you have to know this school is rural or urban. So it must be clear in detail that I said in the Methodology must be detailed. So there is a location. Then, we have the materials. Okay, just now we had this study on Animated Script Textual Discourse yes. So now I have a sample, I have the location of this study. The sample we take school students for us to interview for the animated script. I also have materials or instruments that I use. So now the story about this material, the story about the animated folklore published by Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP) that are written by Normaliza Abd Rahim this year.

I wrote this folklore animation and the songs, song lyrics, scripts were all written and published by the Language and Library Council. And if you look at the Google Store, there are 33 stories and 33 songs. It's a sudden promotion. Okay, now it is permissible for anyone to point to your child, or a neighbor to have a sibling, or a neighbor to have a child, sibling or child, even his grandchildren. We actually sell it very cheap, and I made all of those animations. Indeed, I made and published by DBP. The meaning is indeed the language is good, and folklore is the folklore of our Malay people from generation stories. Please look at the Google Store, but Apple does not have.

So now we put this in this material. Then, here we will also place a synopsis. Synopsis of folklore. For example, the folklore title number one, namely Cenderawasih. For example, I will place a synopsis here. I need a synopsis, because now we need to remember, we know this story, but the examiner does not know. The person who will read our thesis did not know. So we lay the synopsis. For example, I take 20 folk tales. The location of 20 story synopsis in this. Must be a location and need a location. Then we go to procedures. So our procedure, we get a location sometimes it is depends on the students and supervisors. There are procedures that are located in the form of points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 to 10. There are procedures that are located in the form of a paragraph, meaning that if there are five procedures, they are located in the form of five paragraph, there is no problem. Provided we know that the first procedure is related to the second procedure is related to the third, the fourth is related.

Don't be the number one you say you take what this name you call a student or, maybe just wanted to follow objective one he identified the textual discourse script. You can also take the animated script and then you analyze it. Analysis using this…this…this… all of a sudden, the second procedure you have called students to give an opinion? When did you call the boy to read the script? When was that. It seems that the step of the procedure has jumped so it is wrong. So make sure this is up to the point form or paragraph form but paragraph. But make sure it depends on how you conduct the study, that is important. Steps on how to conduct the study. You only the one who knows, but everyone else do not know. So then, need to follow the step at a time.

Okey, now back to 3.5 which is analysis. This analysis is important because now we have two objectives. So the description can follow the objective. So you hurried the first analysis. First what is used in this way. So this is where you will be where you wrote the coding earlier. Remember the coding I talked about in chapter 4 earlier? Kinds of examples, let's snap it up. Okay, for example, you have made coding SK1 to SK30 for the script. Scripts 1 through 30. S1 to S30 are sample for sample 1 until 30. So that, you get to explain this analysis and the outline was clear. This SK is usually sometimes people will make it in the form of a schedule. That is in the meaning here, SK means the script.

Okay, lets say SK1 means script 1. The sample you want to use sample 1 means sample 1. There are a box, later your description will decript that SK is refers to anything, then describes…describes… describes… This is a big why coding is important. Because in the data if there is no coding, we want to put this, we will not understand. We do not want to search every time we want to type script 1, script 2, script 3. It can not be like that. And also this one before you have this one, there must be another table that shows SK1 the meaning of what Paradise story is. Okay SK2 what story? Okay sparrow for exampl. This is the title, whish is the title of the script. The script you got from the animated story just now. It has to be in this place, this is the place where it will be explained.

Then down there you tell me how you analyzed the data. Give an example of how you want to analyze. So this is sometimes, a clever students, they just looks at Chapter 4. Okay, how does he bring chapter 4 a little near here. Example of analysis so that the examiner understands, "Oh, this is how he analyzes apparently for objective 1". "Oh, this is how it is analyzed for objective 2". Separate the way you want to describe the analysis of objective 1 with objective 2 and objective 3. And that is where the examiner will understand how to analyze this data. Next, after doing some kind of analysis, we have 3.4 Theoretical Framework. So this theoretical framework is on point 3.4.

Okay the theoretical framework is the selection of your theory of what kind of theory you want to use. So now we have chosen the Theory of Discourse Analysis Normaliza Abd Rahim 2019. So draw a theoretical framework, write here Theory of Discourse Analysis. Then you put it as it used to be. So this is his skeleton. Then below is figure 1 Theory of Discourse Analysis Normaliza Abd Rahim 2019. Then, when there is this 3.4, then below explain about the theory. In figure 1 above, da… da… daaa… And in this you describe one by one these descriptions of this theory of Normaliza Abd Rahim. This alone alone is about 2 to 3 pages because this is important because the description of this theory is important. There is no theory that it is difficult to walk. So we do not want to use je analysis.

I also found that when I became a Viva examiner, there were also students who when they were presented were really surprised. My eyes widened for a moment, gaping for a moment, because he said "Oh, no theory is used". Oh tired of that time I was really surprised, I really don't know what to do. How can he analysis the data without any theoretical. He said "Oh, I think", he meep saying "I think", this is not where you feel. So now he figure 1 describes everything. Each of these but remember yes, the description of the theory should not be completely copied. For example, my theory is in my book. Discourse Study of Communication Theory and Application Strategies.

In the theory book, there are also slaves, go and copy completely. He reminded us not to look. I am diligent in reading yes. So don't, change the sentence. That's what people say to paraphrase those verses. So, but it should be mentioned according to Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) content blah..blah..blah. So the story, the story about the theory and also in this theory can also be the story about the theory of discourse analysis Normaliza Abd Rahim refers to the theory proposed by anyone before. Improving previous theories because the old theories are all found 1980, 1977. Some are too old while we need to know that in ancient times, we humans were different. We are digital now.

Human speaks more and dares to speak virtually. And also in fact that can indeed do a lot of research. If now, when we talks to a little children, we ask one question, but he answered 46. So in the old days it was true the old people said it asked him one question answered 10. But now in 2020, we ask one question he answered 47 answers. Indeed, we want to hear until the words stop, he will not stop answering. Even after we are ready to go to the supermarket to for buying things, there is no end of their words. That's how the kids nowdays. That is why we can not use it, but sometimes not relevant to the current situation.

Furthermore, if we want to do a research on interaction, on speech, on different writing. If we used to have year 6, may the has grammar and it is surely different from now, that year 6 nowdays they want to be close to the same level as Form 5 in the past. So it is very different, that is why when we find a new theory, we adopt a new one. Because the person who made this study gave a birth to this theory, he has done hundreds of studies before he got those theory, like Normaliza Abd Rahim's Discourse Analysis Theory, she has done a hundred research just for finding of new, to get this theory. That is too saturated exchanging, try this again, try this experiment again, the experiment did not happen. Finally she got one that can be fit in the current state of our digital era. 

Okay, after creating this theoretical framework, we have 3.5 conceptual frameworks. So this conceptual framework follows each supervisor. Because there are supervisors who say the conceptual framework is like a procedure. Some say this is not a conceptual framework. Okay, I have explained this in this book. In fact all of this is subject to the faculty supervisor and the University. They just a guide to this book. I didn't even tell me to buy this book. But if you're looking for something near a shopee, there's also a sale. I was also surprised that UPM said it could buy it there. Okay now, if we look at the example I show you about this framework, the one on the left is right. This shows a conceptual framework. This is my way. Those kind of things that I said earlier.

Maybe other supervisors are different, maybe some of the will say, "Oh this is not a conceptual framework, but it was a procedure", some say that. Some say "Oh this is another way". It's okay, don't worry, please don't be upset.. Students just need to follow the instructions of their respective supervisors. Remember, this is a guide. I want to teach how, the way I want to share so that you can imagine "Oh this is his way". But if you do something else, it doesn't matter, there is no problem. If the conceptual framework exists, it is placed in one page. When the conceptual framework, when we look at it once while you have described all this in chapter 3. But once I look at it I understand the groove, "Oh use this instrument", "Oh this material". So we can see more clearly near here.

If I want to be detailed, I will go and look back to see that he has a description for each of these subtopics. For me that is the conceptual framework. So for students it depends on how but this for me is clear. Okay if you look at the material okay I want to see more details look near chapter 3. So put this at the end. So this 3.5 does not need a description. There is no need for a description at all because the description has already been made. Put je kat at the top of this one page is finished. Then, 3.6 continues to enter the conclusion. So in this conclusion as usual you conclude in one paragraph. Remember, as I said earlier, all chapters have conclusions except chapter 5. All chapters have an introduction, all chapters have no exceptions. So there must be.

Each introductory chapter does describe what is in the chapter. Okay for chapter 3, he usually asks "Prof how many pages is chapter 3?". So this chapter 3 we actually do not, because we are just things all the descriptions we have yes. So you don't need much. Not up to 40 pages. Okay in this, he also mentioned that this is usually me, I said there is no need up for 10 to 12 like that. Not up to 20 pages. If 20 pages of stuff you want to make. Maybe that's a lot here, synopsis of the story, maybe that's a lot. But the rest is all, because we need to be clear. Like we told the story about the sample, that is okay, this material is okay. If for example we do a study on Instagram, for example. So we need to put the material, maybe we can do a screencapture for an example, and put near there. Okay example that Instagram. We can put it there but this is not a necessary. It is because we have a little synopsis for those 20 stories. Thats are so much longer.

Get about 10 to 12 pages. Because this is not an analysis chapter, this is a methodology chapter. The way we conduct research. Okay apart from that, I think for chapter 3 if you look at everything I have explained in detail and also the description for each one has to be long, the sample, location, material, have to be long. Sometimes there are also students who put the pilot word. Examples in post-procedure procedures to about pilot, pilot study. It could also be because we want to inform that a pilot study is being conducted. Sometimes he puts chapter 3. Okay, you can also want to put it there so that sometimes this pilot study involves a questionnaire. Questionnaires are sometimes piled up two or three times even incorrectly. Try again and again until the questionnaire is completely perfect.

So that can be explained in this. But if it does not involve questions it does not matter. If this is an example, in this material just now. This is the material because this study involves scripts. So if it involves interview questions. Meaning, here there must be another instrument. Okay, this is the reason why I did not use the study. So if it involves a questionnaire, it should be an instrument. So here you have to describe what instrument, questionnaire. So in this questionnaire you usually just put it. If sometimes people put it in the attachment. Yes, but you can explain what is there. Okay part A contains 5 questions. what was that question?, part B what it is, part C what it is. Okay this 3.3.4.1.

After that, you also have an interview question. How the interview was conducted, describe here. And also the interview question put question 1 what is he, questions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Here if you want to put about a pilot study. So it is all here. So if you use an instrument, if there is no need to put it. So now there must be. So if for example, the questionnaire does not want to be placed here. Ordinary people put in attachments. Interview questions can be asked because there are not too many questions. Usually for the study we do need to have a trianglelation. That is meaning on this section, we have an interview, we have a questionnaire, and maybe another one is for the observation.

That is, if we wants to meet the student, we has to do an observation at first. Make sure that when there is an observation we have to explain to the student what kind of way he is. Did you put a video on the side, did you notice him interviewing you and the student or two students in the front. You have to put the video, you have to tell it. Tell me the ways here. The means of observation are carried out. After that, during the procedure, you need to explain the step by step from start until the end. If you want to separate according to the objective, it does not matter. Because your objective 1 was different from objective 2. Okay, you understand this right. So, I hope this one, I repeat again, we have an introduction, a design. Just look here, we have the introduction, design, method, sample, location, material or instrument is really here. I forgot just now, sorry for that.

So we have the material we explain the material. If we have the ingredients. Then we isolate it with the instrument we use. So if there are both, put them both at once. But make sure the numbering is different. Then, we have the procedure, the analysis. Then, we have a theoretical framework and a conceptual framework. And finally the conclusion. So, in this chapter about 10 to 12 pages. At most 15. So usually students rarely make up to 15 pages. Because there is nothing we can explain at length yes. So remember this chapter 3 is very important. This chapter 3 that is the common of our studies. The meaning of the description of how we want to conduct the research. So in this, remember it is not necessary when you write a sample, then first write the sample definition. What do you want to do with that? The examiners or anyone do not want to read about that.

There are also students write definitions, according to the board dictionary blah blah blah. Indeed, it will just being cross by the red pen. There is no need for any of these definitions. Because this is all we have, students have. Except if here you want to tell a little definition, not a definition but a reference, that's fine. If there is no reference there is no problem. Because remember this chapter 3 we have, except for theory. The theory is not ours. That's all. We don't have the theory, we use from others. Because we want the examiners understand how our study carried out. We want to tell if, for example, other students, if they read by referring on our thesis, they will surely understand on how does our study been carried out.
 

Rujukan:

Prof. Dr Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2020). 8. Metodologi (Bab 3) #JomTulisTesis. Diakses pada Januari 7, 2021 melalui pautan 

Saya sudah subscribe! 



Kehadiran minggu 11!


BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(11)







9a. Keputusan dan Perbincangan (Bab 4)-Analisis Bentuk Jadual-1. #JomTulisTesis

Okay sekarang kita pergi ke bab 4 ya. Bab 4 ni kalau kita lihat sebenarnya kita buat analisis. Inilah yang dikatakan bab ataupun kajian awak penulisan awak sendiri apa yang awak kajiselama bertahun-tahun. Inilah hasilnya. jadi dalam bab 4 ni kalau kita lihat dalam buku ini kita Sebenarnya kalau bab 4 ini kita ada pengenalan kemudian kita ada analisis objektif 1 kemudian analisis objektif dua, analisid objektif 3, rumusan dan kesimpulan. Okey kalau Kita tengok sekarang ya contohnya kita ada kalau kita Berbalik kepada kajian yang tadi ya kajian kita yang tadi iaitu Kajian Wacana Tekstual Skrip Animasi Cerita Rakyat Melayu. 

Jadi 4.1 Pengenalan kita nak memperkenalkan perkara yang ada dalam bab ini, biasanya pelajar ni dia pergi letak pengenalan siap ada rujukan lagi tak perlu tak perlu ada rujukan. pengenalan ni kita nak memperkenalkan apa yang ada dalam bab itu tapi jangan bagi dia keliru kadang-kadang bila dia letak rujukan tu dah jadi macam bab 2 sorotan kajian pula. Jadi sekarang ini bahagian pengenalan satu perenggan, kita masukkan 4.2 iaitu kita dah mula untuk melihat balik kepada objektif kita yang pertama mengenalpasti wacana tekstual skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu. Jadi tajuk kita ini kita sebenarnya ambil daripada objektif. Jadi bila kita ambil daripada objektif, perkataan mengenal pasti dah tak ada. Jadi kita terus kepada wacana tekstual okay sambung skrip animasi cerita rakyat melayu. 

3Dalam tajuk ini, awak dah letak bermakna bila pemeriksa tengok dia tahu ini dia merujuk kepada objektif satu. Jadi sekarang ini sekarang ini bila awak dah ambil tajuk ini awak akan menggunakan teori. Teori tu kita dah bincang kan dalam bab 3 tadi Jadi kita nak menggunakan teori bila analisis kita perlu guna teori jika tiada diri macam seolah-olah kita tidak ada berpegang kepada apa-apa saja bermakna longgar. Bila longgar tu nanti kita punya huraian analisis kita jadi salah Jadi sekarang ini kita akan merujuk kepada teori contohnya wacana tektual kita akan guna teori analisis wacana yang yang dicadangkan oleh contohnya Okey contohnya kita ambil Teori Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abdul Rahim (2019). jadi sekarang Teori Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) yang terbahagi kepada 3 elemen iaitu kandungan, konteks dan juga andaian. Kandungan ini kita ada tema, tatabahasa kemudian ada latar dan emosi kemudian di sini ada pendapat, perujukan, persoalan.

Oleh kerana data yang kita nak analisis dalam bab 4 ni kita nak menggunakan teori analisis wacana Jadi kita kena rujuk kita kena tulis beginilah. Setelah kita tulis tajuk ini kita terus pergi ke 4.2.1 iaitu kandungan. Kita kena tulis dia, apakah elemen dia terus dekat dalam ini. Hal ini kerana hari kerana pemeriksa bila dia tengok kajian ini memang merujuk kepada teori.

Jadi dalam kandungan itu maknanya Sekarang awak buat keputusan bahawa setiap elemen ini, awak kena sediakan lima bukti. Jadi bukti kita dah dapat daripada skrip itu tadi. Jadi kandungan, kemudian daripada kandungan daripada skrip awak dah ada data. Jadi contohnya awak dah ada sistem coding macam contohnya sekarang skrip animasi cerita rakyat, awak ambil lebih kurang 30 skrip animasi dan awak nomborkan skrip animasi itu dengan menggunakan coarding skrip. Ini terpulang ya, SK1 Sehingga SK30. Jadi awak ada SK1 hingga SK30. Jadi sekarang ini awak boleh letak. Jadi maknanya daripada 30 contoh itu tadi awak cuma nak ambil 5 sahaja contoh sedangkan yang lain ada diletakkan di lampiran. 

Kita tak boleh nak hurai sampai 30, saya rasa nanti adalah sehingga 4,5 jilid nanti awak punya tesis. Jadi sekarang ini contohnya, ini adalah skrip, yang ini dia punya tema sebab tadi bawah kandungan ialah tema. Jadi sekarang contohnya awak letak skrip SK10 SK13 SK20 SK23 sebab yang ini yang awak peroleh. Yang ini awak boleh letak jadual 1 tema kekeluargaan, ini contoh sebab awak sendiri sudah kenal pasti daripada 30 skrip ini awak dah kenal pasti ada contohnya 5 tema yang menyerlah dalam skrip ini. Daripada tema kekeluargaan, adalah tema-tema yang lain. Daripada tema kekeluargaan awak dapati bahawa 5 skrip ini yang nampak menyerlah. Jadi awak ambil skrip 10 kemudian awak letak tema. 

Memang kita letak tema kekeluargaan kemudian kekeluargaan lagi tapi walaupun semua ini kekeluargaan, tetapi awak kena pastikan bahawa dari segi macam mana yang ada tema kekeluargaan kerana cerita dan rakyat ini kadang-kadang dari segi kekeluargaan contohnya cerita pipit dengan cenderawasih itu dengan anak dia. Bermakna dua sahaja kekeluargaan, jadi maknanya di sini kekeluargaan awak letak dia punya watak, cenderawasih dan anaknya. Yang kekeluargaan SK13 nak cerita, watak yang menunjukkan kekeluargaan tersebut, jadi awak senaraikan. Kemudian bawah jadual 1 ini yang awak buat huraian iaitu jadual 1 di atas menunjukkan tema kekeluargaan kemudian dalam sini awak huraikan satu-satu. 

Jelaskan tentang tema kekeluargaan skrip ke-10 ini tentang watak oleh cenderawasih dan anaknya, macam mana yang menunjukkan tema kekeluargaan. Sebab itulah awak kena ambil ayat daripada skrip itu dan ditunjukkan di sini bukti sebagai bukti letak kat sini, ayat ini menunjukkan kekeluargaan yang mana cenderawasih dia telah memberi anak dia makan dengan dengan penuh kasih sayang sebab ayat dalam skrip itu menunjukkan sebegitu. Kemudian setelah awak dah kenal pasti tema kekeluargaan itu berikan awak punya pendapat.

Pendapat awak pula, apa yang awak dapati, adakah ini menunjukkan kekeluargaan?, macam mana contoh yang menunjukkan hubungan kekeluargaan contohnya pemburu dengan anaknya dan isteri di rumah ataupun contohnya pengail ikan. Ha jadi itu yang awak kena hurai berserta dengan pendapat. Jadi pendapat biasanya pelajar akan tulis, hal ini berkemungkinan. Sebab ini daripada pendapat awak, jadi kita boleh gunakan perkataan hal ini berkemungkinan burung cenderawasih seekor burung yang sangat penyayang terhadap anaknya kerana burung cenderawasih didapati sentiasa berada disisi anaknya. Itulah pendapat awak, awak hurai sampai habis. 

10Kemudian belum habis di situ lagi, kemudian jadual yang kedua pula tema lain pula serupa juga huraian. Yang bahagian huraian yang ini, dia bukan dalam satu perenggan biasanya dia letak dalam dua perenggan. Kita pecahkan sebab kalau tidak nanti dia jadi terlalu panjang, akan pergi ke satu halaman, dua halaman sampai macam tu. Jadi sekarang untuk kandungan sahaja yang tema itu awak dah ada 5 jadual. Belum masuk lagi bahagian yang kedua yang kita nak huraikan teori iaitu konteks. Ini baru bahagian ini. 

Jadi maknanya sekarang masuk 4.2.2 kita masuk konteks. Bila awak dah letak konteks, huraikan dulu itu konteks menurut Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Sama juga dengan yang ini nanti, awak kena huraikan maksud kandungan menurut Teori Analisis Wacana menurut Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), huraikan sedikit baru masuk jadual. Serupa juga dengan yang ini, maknanya huraikan makna konteks menurut Teori Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim. Kemudian barulah awak bahagikan kepada yang ini. 

Yang ini oleh kerana elemen di bawah konteks ada tiga, jadi menurut teori ini tatabahasa ini sangat luas terpulanglah kepada pelajar contohnya memilih tiga tatabahasa, tiga latar, tiga emosi. Sebab tatabahasa besar jadi terpulang kepada teks itu. Awak lihat yang ini banyak atau yang ini banyak atau tidak jadi itulah yang awak kaji. Kalau macam latar ini terbahagi latar masa, latar tempat dan latar masyarakat. Emosi positif, negatif. Jadi yang ini awak boleh terus bahagikan. Yang ini ada banyak jadi maknanya awak kena pastikan sistem penomboran betul. 4.2.2.1 kita masuk tatabahasa. Huraikan dahulu tatabahasa, menurut siapa? Tahun berapa?. Tapi kajian ini berfokus kepada tiga sahaja. Jadi yang ini memang banyaklah, kalau tidak ada sistem penomboran nanti kita akan keliru. 

Yang ini barulah kita pecahkan kepada yang di bawah tatabahasa ini. Jadi kita ambil tiga saja yang bawah tatabahasa, jadi awak nak fokus kepada apa sekarang ni kalau bawah tatabahasa. Kemudian seperti biasa, ada subtopik, huraikan sikit makna itu. Kemudian yang ini barulah awak masukkan data. Ingat ya! Sudah masukkan data, semua jadual dalam tesis perlu ada garisan yang melintang sahaja, yang menegak tidak perlu ada. Jadi letak di sini, jadual dan hurai. Nombor jadual ini sambung yang tadi, yang tadi 5 dan sekarang sambung 6.

Jadi untuk tatabahasa ini, oleh kerana awak kena ambil tiga, jadi awak boleh sediakan tiga jadual. Tiga jadual untuk tatabahasa. Latar pula ada tiga, tiga untuk masa, tiga untuk tempat, tiga untuk emosi . Emosi pun sama ada tiga positif dan negatif. Ingat bila kita tulis, jadual 6 di atas. Sebab ada pelajar yang tulis jadual 6 menunjukkan, dah kita pula sebagai pemeriksa kita pening nak cari jadual. Di atas atau di bawah. Jadi tak boleh. Kena tulis kalau di bawah, di atas dan huraikan. Sebab itulah bab 4, sistem penomboran ini penting kerana kita nak tahu sama ada ia adalah subtopik atau sub sub taktopik. Macam ini, ini subtopik, ini anak kepada sub subtopik. Jadi bila ada nombor, kita dapat tahu ini dibawah kategori yang ini, ini dibawah kategori yang ini. Ini contoh huraian, yang lain pun sama. 

Objektif kajian ini ada dua, yang pertama tadi menganalisis wacana tekstual, dia ambil dua ini dengan menggunakan dua elemen pertama dengan dua elemen kedua teori analisis wacana. Kemudian objektif tiga menggunakan elemen ketiga daripada teori analisis wacana iaitu andaian yang mana dia temu bual pelajar dan beri komen tentang skrip animasi cerita rakyat. Jadi dia pecahkan yang ini sahaja, yang ini tidak perlu lagi. Ini untuk objektif satu, ini untuk objektif kedua. Jadi lebih jelas. 

Jadi sekarang ini, kandungan dah siap, konteks dah siap bermakna dah siap objektif satu. Jadi setelah itu awak kena letak dia punya rumusan untuk objektif satu iaitu rumusan untuk kandungan dan konteks. Jadi tulis rumusan ini dalam satu perenggan. Dalam ini sangat penting, yang mana perlu sokong kajian daripada bab dua. Sebab bab dua itu tadi ialah sorotan kajian yang berkaitan dengan kajian kita, kita kena sokonglah. Kemudian kita kena sokong dengan teori, contohnya yang awak buat itu tadi, kena sokong dengan Teori Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Jadi awak rumuskan tengok sama ada sama atau tidak. 

Jadi contohnya, perkataan kajian ini selari, kajian ini hampir sama dan apa lagi. Jadi perkataan ini awak perlu pilih yang bertepatan, bersesuaian. Kajian ini bertepatan dengan hasil kajian yang dilakukan oleh blablabla iaitu dalam bab2. Jadi kena letak kena letak sokongan ini. Tapi ingat ya, sokongan ini haruslah daripada kajian 5 tahun terkini sahaja. Pastikan 5 tahun terkini saja kalau sekarang ini contoh 2020 jadi tahun terkini ialah jadi lima tahun kebelakang. Jadi lima tahun kebelakang habis sampai 2016 sahaja. Jangan sokong Kajian yang 2010, 2009 tahun 1980 an sebab kita kena kenal pasti bahawa kajian-kajian tentang wacana contohnya banyak telah banyak dilakukan sejak dulu. Animasi punya banyak. Animasi cerita rakyat pun banyak tetapi cerita rakyat yang luar negara. Jadi kita perlukan yang terkini supaya tesis kita adalah lebih berkualiti dan up to date dan terkini. Jadi ini baru rumusan objektif satu. Jadi kita masuk rumusan objektif dua pula bermakna 4.3 adalah objektif dua iaitu menganalisis kesan skrip animasi cerita rakyat. 

Jadi di sini ialah kesan. Jangan tulis perkataan analisis. Kesan skrip bla bla bla bla bla ayat yang awak dapat daripada atas . Kemudian barulah awak letak andaian. Huraikan sikit dulu maksud andaian menurut Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), andaian yang bla bla bla bla bla bla. Okey kemudian dah masukkan andaian barulah kita nak masuk kepada yang ini, pendapat. Ini ialah subtopik untuk pendapat. Huraikan dahulu, pendapat menurut Normaliza Abd Rahim, berikan definisi pendapat. Setelah itu, barulah ada jadual ini. Jadi setiap satu awak boleh bagi bukti daripada perbualan kanak-kanak itu tadi. Di sini juga awak kena pakai sistem coding bahasa, bukan coding sains komputer. Tadi sudah ada coding untuk skrip, sekarang coding untuk sampel.

Sampel kajian, sebab kita dah ambil temu bual pelajar sekolah rendah. Contohnya kita ambil 30 orang pelajar, adakah kita nak tulis S1 sehingga S30 ? Jadi ini yang awak kena letak kat dalam analisis bab 3, macam mana sistem coding awak ini. Jadi yang ini awak buat keputusan sendiri, ini hanya cadangan. Jadi awak letaklah S1 ke S2, daripada apa yang awak dapati. Jadi semua data-data yang awak perolehi ini memang kita kena letak dekat belakang, lampiran. Namun yang kita letak kat sini cuma yang berkaitan saja sebab ada yang ayat yang tidak menunjukkan pendapat, ada ayat yang tidak menunjukkan perujukan, ada ayat tidak menunjukkan persoalan iaitu bertitik-tolak daripada Teori Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Jadi awak pilih mana yang sesuai sahaja. 

Jadi dia akhirnya, juga jangan lupa letak rumusan. Nombor itu 4.3.2. Rumuskan balik tentang dapatan keputusan kajian daripada objektif kedua dan ingat seperti yang tadi juga, rumusan itu perlu sokong dengan kajian 5 tahun kebelakang sahaja. Kemudian awak kena sokong dengan teori. Mesti ada. Bermakna di sini yang kita akan sokong daripada keputusan kajian ini kita akan sokong. Kemudian ini akhirnya ialah 4.4 barulah kesimpulan. Okey dalam kesimpulan saya jelaskan lagi sekali ayat akhir mestilah kita ceritakan tentang yang ada dalam bab seterusnya. Ini adalah supaya ada kesinambungan di antara dua bab iaitu bab empat dan bab lima. Contohnya ayat akhir bab empat blablabla dan sambungannya. 

Yang ini tentang rumusan, yang saya kata rumusan habis daripada huraian rumusan ini sebenarnya terpulang kepada pensyarah ada pensyarah dia tidak mahu letak rumusan di akhir setelah kita analisis. Dia sekadar ada yang disokong kajian pada tiap-tiap huraian tu disokong. Itu terpulang kepada pensyarah sebab bagi saya mudah sahaja. Apa kita rumuskan, kita ulang balik kemudian kita sokonglah. Sama juga kalau kita letak dalam tu juga kadang-kadang yang saya dapati ada pelajar yang dia memang sokong setiap kali dia hurai tentang pendapat, dia sokong. Kemudian hurai perujukan, dia sokong lagi. Saya tengok ayat dia sama. Apa yang disokong juga orang yang sama. Jadi seolah-olah macam tiada usaha sangat untuk dia membuat ayat yang berbeza. Jadi pastikan di sini ayat mestilah berbeza daripada ayat di atas sebab yang ini penting kita nak merumuskan apa hasil kajian yang kita peroleh daripada sini.

Okey untuk bab 4 ini oleh kerana kita ada dua objektif. Ingat yang bab 4 ini kita punya, kita yang analisis, kita punya memang beza dengan orang lain. Ini yang kita usaha selama ni. Inilah kita usaha temubual orang, kita usaha pergi cari budak-budak sekolah, tunggu luar pagar kita walaupun sebenarnya sepatut ambil kebenaran dekat cikgu sekolah tapi kena kena keluar daripada sekolah sebab bawak salah surat. Jadi kita kena tunggu kat luar sekolah, kena tunggu luar sekolah mak bapak halau pula. Bertabah jadi penyelidik ni ya. Jadi contohnya daripada objektif satu ini 40 halaman untuk objektif satu sahaja, objektif dua 40. Ini untuk master. Kalau PHD kita nak masuk lagi 40 bermakna 120. Yang ini ingat ya, dalam tiap-tiap halaman tak bolehlah awak letak objektif satu 20 sahaja, tapi objektif dua saya analisis banyak jadi saya letak 70, dah tak boleh la. Objektif 3 tiba-tiba sikit sahaja, dah tak larat jari ini nak tekan laptop. 10 sahaja lah. Dah salah. Nampak sangat bahawa objektif satu ini lagi penting daripada objektif dua dan tiga.

Jadi dah salah. Kita mesti sama supaya setiap objektif kita ini mesti sama taraf pentingnya. Jadi janganlah tiba-tiba objektif 3 jadi tak penting. Biasanya objektifnya akhir tu lagi penting, yang menunjukkan kebaharuan. Jadi ini yang penting. Jadi kalau nak lari sikit pun boleh macam contohnya objektif 1, 41. Objektif 2, 39. Objektif 3, 43 bolehlah. Tapi jangan ketara sampai macam ni. Bila macam ni, kita dah nampak kepentingan tu sangat berbeza. Jadi macam seolah-olah baik tak payah wujudnya objektif satu. Objektif 3 buang sahaja baik tak payah ada. Tiba-tiba kajian ada satu objektif. Itu memanglah saya tak tahu nak cakap apa. Saya kata buatlah universiti sendiri. 

Jadi sekarang ini pastikan bab empat ini kita punya. Bila kita punya kita rasa bangga. Penulisan kena cantik. Dalam bab ini, semua bab dala tesis, saya akan ulang untuk semua bab, perlu ada penanda wacana. penanda wacana ini kalau tak ada dah tak jadi penulisan akademik. Ini sangat penting. Penanda wacana kalau tengok daripada dalam buku ini, saya ada senaraikan penanda wacana yang awak boleh pakai. Janganlah perkataan biasa. Biasa pelajar di suka sangat perkataan "oleh itu". "oleh itu" sahajalah yang jumpa sepanjang-panjang. Ini nampak ni ada penanda wacana, ada beratus-ratus penanda wacana. 

Sila gunakan semuanya. kita boleh gunakan berlainan menunjukkan ia penulisan akademik. Bila kita baca tesis itu sejuknya lah hati baca tesis ini. Tetapi ada masalah pula, ada pelajar yang tesisnya saya baca memang dia pakai penanda wacana, sangat bagus. Bukan daripada buku saya agaknya. Mungkin dia ambil daripada internet. Tetapi bila tengok, memang tak jadi. Maksud saya penanda wacana itu tidak kena dengan ayat itu. Perkataan itu memang tidak pernah didengar oleh masyarakat. Memang pernah dengar tapi jarang digunakan. Saya ambil contohnya, “namun demikian suatu hakikat yang tidak boleh dikesampingkan" ialah bla bla bla bla tapi itu penanda wacana itu untuk ayat yang pertama okey. Tiba-tiba ayat yang seterusnya jadi jadi tak betul. Tak kena dengan pemilihan penanda wacana. Maka adalah wajar untuk pelajar menggunakan penanda wacana yang betul dan pelbagaikan. Jangan guna perkataan "oleh itu" itu daripada halaman 1 sampai halaman akhir. Penanda wacana saya akan ulang untuk semua bab dalam video supaya menjadi peringatan kepada pelajar. 

Saya dah terangkan dengan jelas dan juga penggunaan jadual-jadual ini juga. Jadi ingat, jadual ini kalau boleh, Ada pelajar di suka buat macam ini. Jadual ini oleh kerana bab empat. dia buat jadual 4.1, jadual 4.2. Itu terpulang kepada pelajar dan juga persetujuan pensyarah. Itu kepelbagaian. Tetapi pastikan bahawa macam ni bila kita buat macam tu memang penyelia setuju, awak pun rasa macam cantiknya letak 4.1 tapi pemeriksa yang lihat atau baca tesis awak orang-orang yang berbeza Iaitu yang kata sekolah yang berlainan, school of thought. 

Jadi bila school of thought tu berbeza bermakna mungkin saya punya pemikiran cara saya begini. Cara penyarah begini. Cara pelajar lagilah bukan saja begini begini begitu dan sebagainya sebab pelajar ni dia macam kreatif sedikit jadi terpulang yang penting ialah kita bila buat kita nak pastikan bahawa mudah untuk pemeriksa tu baca dan mudah untuk pemeriksa itu paham yang kita nak cakap kat kita jangan bagi dia susah. Kalau kita dia susah nanti kita kena buat tesis ni lagi sekali alamat lah kita kena buat lagi dengan 5 tahun akan datang 

Jadi kita ingat jangan terlalu lama buat tesis, tulis menulis ini kerana bila terlalu Lama kita akan rasa macam kita rasa sangsi betul ke yang kita buat selama ni, ke saya ni berpura-pura ke angan-angan ke pura-pura pandai ke, dah tak pasti dah ya. Okey saya rasa ini sahaja untuk bab 4 ni ya. 


TERJEMAHAN BAHASA INGGERIS 

9a. Results and Discussion (Chapter 4)-Table-1 Form Analysis. #Let'sWriteAThesis

Okay now we go to chapter 4. Chapter 4 if we look at the fact we do an analysis. This is what your chapter or study says in your own writing what you have studied over the years. This is the result. so in this chapter 4 if we look in this book we In fact if this chapter 4 we have an introduction then we have objective analysis 1 then objective analysis two, objective analysis 3, summary and conclusion. Okay We'll see now if ya like we have if we are back to an earlier study of our study was that just now the exposition Textual Studies Script Animation Folklore Festival. 

So 4.1 Introduction we want to introduce the things in this chapter, usually this student he goes to put the introduction ready there is a reference again there is no need there is no need for a reference. In this introduction, we want to introduce what is in the chapter, but do not confuse him sometimes when he puts the reference, it becomes like chapter 2, the study highlights. So now is the introduction of the paragraph, we put 4.2 which we have started to look back to our first objective textual discourse identify the animation script Malay folklore. So this is our title we actually take from the objective. So when we take from the objective, the word identify is no more. So we continue to connect okay textual discourse animation script Malay folklore.

In this title, you put meaning when the examiner sees he knows this he is referring to objective one. so right now right now when you take this title you will use theory. We have discussed that theory in chapter 3 earlier. So we want to use theory when our analysis needs to use theory if there is no self, as if we do not adhere to anything that means loose. If it is loose then we have a description of our analysis so it is wrong. So now we will refer to the theory for example textual discourse we will use the theory of discourse analysis which is suggested by example. Okay for example we take Theory of Discourse Analysis Normaliza Abdul Rahim (2019). So now the theory of discourse analysis Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) which is divided into 3 elements namely content, context and also assumptions. This content we have a theme, grammar then there is background and emotion then here there are opinions, references, questions.

Because the data we want to analyze in chapter 4 we want to use the theory of discourse analysis. So we have to refer we have to write like this. After we write this title we continue to go to 4.2.1 which is the content. We have to write him What elements he keeps close in this. This is because the examiner when he looked at this study did indeed refer to the theory.

So in that content it means now you decide that each of these elements, you have to provide five proofs. So the proof we got from the script earlier. So what content, then from the content of your script already has data. So for example you already have a coding system like for example now the folk script animation script, you take about 30 animated scripts and you number the animated script using coding script. It depends, yes, SK1 to SK30. So you have SK1 to SK30. So now you can put it. So the meaning of the 30 examples just now you only want to take 5 examples while the others are placed in the appendix.

We can't explain up to 30, I think later it will be up to 4,5 volumes later you have a thesis. So now for example, this is a script, this one he has a theme because just below the content is the theme. So now for example you put the script SK10 SK13 SK20 SK23 because this is the one you got. This one you can put a table of 1 family theme, this is an example because you yourself have identified from these 30 scripts you have identified there are examples of 5 themes that stand out in this script. Instead of family themes, there are other themes. From the family theme you find that these 5 scripts seem to stand out. So you take script 10 then you put the theme.

Indeed we put the theme of family then family again but even though all this is family, but you have to make sure that in terms of how there is a family theme because this story and people sometimes in terms of family for example the story of sparrows with paradise with her child. It means only two families, so the meaning here is your family, he has a character, a bird of paradise and a child. The SK13 family wants to tell the story of what character shows the family, so you list it. Then below this table 1 that you make a description that is table 1 above shows the family theme then in here you describe one by one.

Explain the family theme of this 10th script about the character by bird of paradise and his son, how it shows the family theme. That is why you have to take a sentence from the script and it is shown here as proof as proof here, this sentence shows the family where bird of paradise he has fed his child lovingly because the verse in the script shows so. Then after you have identified the family theme give it your opinion.

In your opinion, what do you find, does this show family?, how can an example show a family relationship such as a hunter with his children and wife at home or for example a fisherman. So that's what you have to explain along with your opinion. So the opinion usually students will write, this is likely. Because this is from your opinion, so we can use the word this thing is probably a bird of paradise a bird that is very loving to its child because the bird of paradise is always found next to its child. That is your opinion, you explain to the end.

Then it is not finished there yet, then the second table is another theme with a similar description. Which part of this description, he is not in one paragraph usually he puts in two paragraphs. We break it because otherwise he will be too long, will go to one page, two pages to that kind. So now for the content only that theme you already have 5 tables. We have not entered the second part that we want to explain the theory of context. This is just this part.

So the meaning now enters 4.2.2 we enter the context. When you have set the context, first explain what the context is according to Normaliza Abd Rahim 2019. Similarly with this one later, you have to explain what the content means according to the Theory of Discourse Analysis according to Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), explain a little before entering the schedule. Similar to this one, the meaning is to explain what the meaning of the context according to Abd Rahim's Theory of Discourse Analysis Theory. Then you divide it into this one.

This is because there are three elements under the context, so according to this theory this grammar is very broad it is up to the student for example choose three grammar, three backgrounds, three emotions. Because big grammar is up to the text. You see this one a lot or this one a lot or not so that's what you study. If this kind of background is divided into time background, place background and community background. Positive, negative emotions. So this one you can continue to divide. This one has a lot so it means you have to make sure the numbering system is correct. 4.2.2.1 we enter grammar. Explain first what grammar is, according to whom? Which year?. But this study focuses on only three. So this one is a lot, if there is no numbering system later we will be confused.

Then we break this down into those under this grammar. So we take only three that are under grammar, so you want to focus on what it is now if it is under grammar. Then as usual, there is a subtopic, describe a little what that means. Then this is when you enter the data. Remember! Already entered the data, all tables in the thesis should have horizontal lines only, vertical ones should not exist. So put it here, the table and the description. This table number is connected to the previous one, the previous one is 5 and now it is connected to 6.

So for this grammar, since you have to take three, so you can prepare three tables. Three tables for grammar. The background is three, three for time, three for place, three for emotion. Emotions are both three positive and negative. Remember when we write, table 6 above. Because there are students who wrote table 6 shows, we as examiners are dizzy to find the schedule. Above or below. So you can't. Must write if below, above and describe. That is why chapter 4, this numbering system is important because we want to know whether it is subtopic or sub subtopic. Like this, this is subtopic, this is a child of sub subtopic. So when there is a number, we can know this is under this category, this is under this category. This is an example of a description, the others are the same.

The objective of this study is two, the first one analyzes the textual discourse, he took these two by using the first two elements with the second two elements of discourse analysis theory. Then objective three uses the third element of discourse analysis theory which is the assumption that he interviews students and comments on the animated script of folklore. So he broke this one only, this one is no longer necessary. This is for objective one, this is for objective two. So it's clearer.

So now, the content is ready, the context is ready means the objective one is ready. so after that you have to put it he has a formula for objective one which is a formula for content and context. So write this summary in one paragraph. In this it is very important, which should support the study of chapter two. Because chapter 2 just now is the highlight of the study related to our study, we have to support it. Then we have to support the theory, for example you made it earlier, we have to support the Theory of Discourse Analysis Theory Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). So you formulate to see if it is the same or not.

So for example, the words of this study are parallel, this study is almost the same and what else. So this word you need to choose the appropriate, appropriate. This study coincides with the results of the study conducted by blablabla in chapter 2. So this support must be placed. But remember, this support should be from the latest 5 year study only. Make sure the last 5 years only if now is the example of 2020 so the latest year is the last five years. So the last five years ended until 2016 only. Do not support the 2010, 2009 and 1980 studies because we have to identify that studies on discourse, for example, have done a lot since time immemorial. Animation has a lot. There are many animated folklore but foreign folklore. So we need the latest so that our thesis is more quality and up to date and up to date. So this is just a summary of objective one. So we come to the conclusion of objective two means 4.3 is objective two which is to analyze the effect of the animated script of folklore.

So here is the effect. Do not write the word analysis. The effect of the script blah blah blah blah blah the sentence you got from above. Then you make the assumption. Explain first, what is the meaning of the assumption according to Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), the assumption that blah blah blah blah blah blah. Okay then I put in the assumption then we want to get into this one, opinion. This is a subtopic for opinion. Explain first, the opinion according to Normaliza Abd Rahim, give the definition of opinion. After that, then there is this schedule. So each of you can give evidence from the child's conversation just now. Here too you have to use a language coding system, not computer science coding. There was already coding for the script, now coding for the sample.

Study sample, because we have taken interviews with primary school students. For example, we take 30 students, do we want to write S1 to S30? So this is what you have to put in the analysis of chapter 3, what is your coding system like. So this one you make your own decision, this is just a suggestion. So you put S1 to S2, from what you found. So all the data you get we have to put near the back, attachment. However, what we put here is only relevant because there are sentences that do not show opinion, there are sentences that do not show reference, there are sentences that do not show questions that are based on the Theory of Discourse Analysis Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). So you choose the appropriate only.

So he finally, also do not forget to put the formula. The number is 4.3.2. Summarize the findings of the study from the second objective and remember as before, the conclusion should be supported by the study 5 years ago only. Then you have to support the theory. Must have. Meaning here that we will support from the results of this study we will support. Then this is finally 4.4 then the conclusion. Okay in my conclusion I explain once again the last sentence we must tell about what is in the next chapter. This is so that there is continuity between the two chapters, namely chapter four and chapter five. For example the last sentence of chapter four blablabla and its continuation.

This one is about the summary, which I said the summary runs out of the description. This summary is actually up to the lecturer there is a lecturer he does not want to put the conclusion at the end after we analyze. He simply supported the study of each of the descriptions. That depends on the lecturer because for me it is easy. What we formulate, we repeat then we support. Similarly, if we put it in there, sometimes I find that there are students who he really supports every time he explains his opinion, he supports. Then explain the reference, he supports again. I see the sentence is the same. What is the supported is also the same person. So it seems like there is not much effort for him to make a different sentence. So make sure that the sentence here must be different from the sentence above because it is important that we want to formulate what research results we get from here.

Okay for this chapter 4 because we have two objectives. Remember that this chapter 4 we have, we are the analysis, we have indeed different from others. This is what we have been trying to do all this time. This is our effort to interview people, we try to go and look for school children, wait outside our fence even though we should actually take permission from the school teacher but we have to leave the school because I brought the wrong letter. So we have to wait outside the school, we have to wait outside the school, mom and dad drive away. Persevere to be this researcher. So for example from objective one this 40 pages for objective one only, objective two 40. This is for master. If our PHD wants to enter another 40 means 120. This one remembers yes, in every page you can not put objective one 20 only, but objective two I analyzed a lot so I put 70, I can not. Objective 3 is suddenly a little, this finger is not enough to press the laptop. Only 10. Wrong. It seems very clear that objective one is more important than objectives two and three.

So it's wrong. We must be the same so that each of our objectives must be of equal importance. So do not suddenly objective 3 so unimportant. Usually the objective of the end is more important, which indicates novelty. So this is what matters. So if you want to run a little, it can be like for example objective 1, 41. Objective 2, 39. Objective 3, 43 is fine. But do not be so obvious as this. When it's like this, we see that the importance is very different. So it seems good that there is no need for the existence of an objective. Objective 3 throw away well no need to have. Suddenly the study had one objective. That of course I do not know what to say. I said make your own university.

So now make sure we have these four chapters. When we have it we feel proud. Writing must be beautiful. In this chapter, all the chapters in the thesis, I will repeat for all the chapters, there must be a discourse marker. This discourse marker, if it does not exist, will not be academic writing. This is very important. Discourse markers if you look at this book, I have a list of discourse markers that you can use. Do not use common words. Usually students like the word "therefore" very much. "therefore" is the only one we meet all the time. It looks like there are discourse markers, there are hundreds of discourse markers.

Please use them all. we can use different shows it academic writing. When we read the thesis, it is cool to read this thesis. But there is a problem, there is a student whose thesis I read is indeed he uses discourse markers, very good. Not from my book presumably. Maybe he took it from the internet. But when you look at it, it does not happen. I mean the discourse marker does not fit the sentence. The word has never been heard by the public. It has been heard but rarely used. I take the example, "however, a fact that can not be ignored" is blah blah blah blah but that is the discourse marker for the first sentence is okay. Suddenly the next sentence becomes incorrect. It does not fit with the selection of discourse markers. It is appropriate for students to use the correct and varied discourse markers. Do not use the word "therefore" from page 1 to the last page. My discourse markers will be repeated for all chapters in the video as a reminder to students.

I have explained clearly and also the use of these tables as well. So remember, this schedule if possible, Some students like to do this. This table is due to chapter four. he made table 4.1, table 4.2. That is up to the students and also the consent of the lecturers. That's diversity. But make sure that like this, when we do that, the supervisor agrees, you also feel like it's beautiful to put 4.1 but the examiner who sees or reads your thesis are different people. That is what different schools say, school of thought.

So when the school of thought is different it means maybe I have thoughts of my way this way. This way of lecturer. The way students do it is not just like this and so on and so on because this student is a little creative so it is up to us when we want to make sure that it is easy for the examiner to read and easy for the examiner to understand what we want to say to us not to give it difficult. If we find it difficult, we will have to do this thesis again, once we have the address, we will have to do it again in the next 5 years.

So we remember not to take too long to write a thesis, write this writing because when it takes too long we will feel like we have a real suspicion of what we have been doing all this time, to me pretending to fantasize to pretending to be clever, no for sure. Okay I think this is only for chapter 4.

Rujukan:

Prof. Dr. Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2020). 9a. Keputusan dan Perbincangan (Bab 4) - Analisis Bentuk Jadual-1 #JomTulisTesis. Diakses pada Januari 8, 2021 melalui pautan https://youtu.be/WkDMTy6FJqA


Saya sudah subscribe!



Kehadiran Minggu 11!